Subject: Distance Education: The *Unofficial* FAQ (Part 1 of 2) From: inrelawmtl@aol.com Date: 1996/11/26 Message-Id: <19961126043500.XAA01355@ladder01.news.aol.com> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Newsgroups: alt.education.distance X-Admin: news@aol.com------------------------------------ From: Institute on Religion and Law Bureau de Montreal By: Steve Levicoff, Ph.D. Respond to: 76624.376@compuserve.com ------------------------------------ In light of the fact that recent dialogue with the esteemed Dr. Dowd has brought things way off course for this newsgroup, I thought it wouldn't hurt to re-post this occasional message. Perhaps it will get things back on track as to the informational nature of the newsgroup . . . ================================================================= Distance Education: The *Unofficial* FAQ (A Periodic Posting) Part 1 of 2 ================================================================= 1. What is distance education? Distance education, in the context of higher education, is simply *any* type of learning that takes place outside the traditional model of on-campus classes attended on a regular basis. Also known as distance learning, nontraditional education, or alternative education, distance education consists of many individual learning methods including correspondence courses, audio or video based courses (including those available on public television), on-line courses via the Internet, independent studies, mentoring, portfolio development (also known as credit for life experience), or challenge examinations (such as the CLEP, ACT-PEP, DANTES, or individual college testing programs such as the TECEP, Regents College, and Ohio University examinations). Distance education does *not* include classes that meet on a *regular* basis at extension or "satellite" campuses, nor so-called "degree completion programs" that meet on a weekly basis over a 12-18 month period, but does include modular class sessions (which may last a day, weekend, or week) for which students do significant pre- and post-session work. 2. What type of distance education is most effective? Whatever works best for *you*. There is no one type of learning methodology that works better than any other. Some students still learn best in the traditional classroom, while others learn best through independent studies. Some can study for, and successfully pass, challenge examinations, while some students who are otherwise quite bright may test poorly but articulate their knowledge in another written or oral format. 3. What are the benefits of distance education? Most of the literature you'll read on distance education or nontraditional degree programs seem to stress the benefits of these methods for persons who otherwise have busy lifestyles, full-time jobs, and family commitments. These are legitimate factors, since most distance programs allow you to schedule your studies with a greater degree of flexibility than you can in traditional schools. However, there are numerous other advantages: You can often self- design your programs to meet your personal interests and professional needs, you can pursue your studies with more creativity than in a traditional classroom using resources in your own community, and you can use learning methods that often excel those traditional courses that focus on didactic lectures. It's also important to realize what the benefits of distance education are *not*. Distance education is not any easier than traditional education (unless you enroll in a degree mill), nor will your studies be any less comprehensive. If you're looking to sluff your way to a degree, this isn't it. In fact, because you don't have professors kicking you in the butt in the classroom, distance education usually requires *more* motivation and energy than its traditional counterpart. 4. How do I begin to learn more about distance education, including how to earn a degree in my chosen field through distance learning? Get off your ass, get to a bookstore, buy a good guidebook on the subject, and read it. Whatever you do, don't expect to get all of your answers here on the newsgroup - not only will you receive incomplete information, much of the information you receive will be inaccurate or highly biased. Then, after you read the guide, blow $32.00 on a roll of stamps and write to 100 different distance education programs for their catalogs and other program literature, using your own informed judgment to determine which program will be right for you. 5. Okay, are there any books you particularly recommend? Glad you asked; there are two. The first is "Campus-Free College Degrees," by Marcie Kisner Thorson, now in its 7th edition. It's available in bookstores or directly from the publisher; for more information, e-mail <marciet@oknet.com>. The other is "The Independent Study Catalog," published by Peterson's Guides in Princeton, New Jersey, for the National University Continuing Education Association. This, too, is available through most bookstores, or call Peterson's directly at (609) 243-9111. The NUCEA guide lists over 10,000 individual high school, college, and graduate-level courses from over 70 schools, almost all of which are legitimately accredited. 6. Uh . . . I've been lurking here for a while and sense a glaring omission. Don't you recommend John Bear's book "Bear's Guide to Earning College Degrees Nontraditionally?" Only with *extreme* caution. John is well credentialed himself, a funny guy, and a humorous writer. However, he has been associated with several schools that I consider degree mills (including Fairfax University, Columbia Pacific, and Greenwich University), and is a paid representative of two foreign degree programs (Heriot-Watt University and the University of Leicester) which, in my opinion, are not good choices for U.S. students. His books are comprehensive, but some of his volumes tend to lump accredited, unaccredited, and questionable schools together (with occasional degree mills thrown into each of the above lists), so that students who are not intimately familiar with the in's and out's of distance education could be led down the path to the depths of degradation. (No, I didn't think of that line; it's from Robert Preston in "The Music Man.") Good reading? Yes, to a degree, but be *very* careful. Remember, John's a funny guy, but contrary to what some other readers would have you believe here, he's not God. 7. Okay, since you're obviously being controversial, what about your own book? Included here for information only . . . I am the author of "Name It and Frame It? New Opportunities in Adult Education and How to Avoid Being Ripped Off by 'Christian' Degree Mills." However, you should be aware that "NIFI" deals *solely* with religious institutions and programs in religious studies, so if you are looking for something more general, this isn't it. If your prospective studies are focused in this area, e-mail me and I'll send you information on it, but otherwise, you're best bet is to read Marcie Thorson's book. (Incidentally, I get no commission or kickback on Marcie's book; it's simply the best book available in the field today.) 8. Now, you mentioned accreditation. There's a lot about that here on the newsgroup . . . What, exactly, is the scoop about accreditation, and why should I be concerned about it? Accreditation is a voluntary process by which colleges, universities, and professional schools ensure their institutional integrity through an outside comprehensive review process. The most credible type of accreditation in the United States is called "regional" accreditation, which means that an institution is accredited by one of the six geographically dispersed associations approved by both the United States Department of Education and the Commission on Recognition of Postsecondary Accreditation (CORPA). The six regional associations are the Middle States, New England, North Central, Northwest, Southern, and Western Associations of Colleges and Schools (a couple of them reverse the words and use Schools and Colleges). The regional association that accredits a school depends on the state in which the school is located (hence the term "regional"); however, the accreditation is recognized on a national level. 9. What about other types of accreditation? There are several professional accrediting agencies that are recognized by both the U.S. Department of Education and CORPA. These accredit either schools, or individual programs within larger schools, in specific professions. In some cases, approval by a professional accreditor is a *must* if you want to sit for a licensure examination such as the psychology boards, nursing boards, or bar examination. Commonly recognized accreditors in this category include the American Psychological Association (APA), the National League for Nursing (NLN), and the American Bar Association (ABA). Be especially careful in these fields: If the program you choose is not approved by its applicable professional accreditor, you will very likely not be able to sit for the licensure exam in most states. In the case of religious colleges and universities, some schools have opted out of regional accreditation in favor of accreditation by the Accrediting Association of Bible Colleges (AABC, for undergraduate programs) or the Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada (ATS, for graduate-level programs), both of which are approved by the U.S. Department of Education and CORPA. A school with AABC or ATS accreditation is legitimate; however, prospective students should realize that credits from such schools will not universally be transferable to regionally accredited schools. 10. What about accrediting agencies that are not approved by the U.S. Department of Education or CORPA? Avoid them like the plague. Many schools claim to be "fully accredited," yet their accreditation comes from bogus agencies or accreditation mills, many of which were founded by the schools themselves. Be *especially* careful of agencies like the Accrediting Commission International and the American Accrediting Association of Theological Institutions (as well as other accreditors that use theological references), and those that use the word "World" in their names. There is no such thing as a "worldwide" accreditation; accreditation is, for the most part, an American phenomenon. The bottom line is simple: as a general rule, if a school is not accredited by one of the six regional agencies, yet claims to be accredited, chances are that it's a degree mill. 11. Speaking of which, what is a degree or diploma mill? These two terms are interchangeable, but I treat them as having distinct definitions. A diploma mill is a school that will sell you a degree or diploma outright, or a school that requires such a minimal amount of work (such as a ten- page dissertation for a doctorate) that its degrees are a joke. A degree mill is a school that actually requires some degree of work, perhaps even a substantive degree or work, but significantly less work than comparable, legitimately accredited programs. You should be aware that several degree mills have been represented here on the newsgroup, either through blatant advertising or through the testimony of its administrators, students, or graduates. These include: American Coastline University, California Coast University, Century University, Columbia Pacific University, Faraston Theological Seminary, LaSalle University, Miami Christian University, and Summit University of Louisiana. (By the way, Miami Christian is one of the more notorious degree mills that advertises its web site here on the newsgroup. If you'd like to read a comprehensive example of what makes a school a degree mill, drop me a line and request "Miami Christian University: Just the FAQ's" and I'll e-mail a copy to you.) You should also be aware that many degree mills appropriate names that are similar to other universities that are regionally accredited. For example, LaSalle University, a degree mill in Louisiana, has no relationship to the regionally accredited LaSalle University in Philadelphia. Miami Christian University, a degree mill, has no relationship to the legitimately accredited Miami Christian College, which is now part of Trinity International University. Trinity Evangelical Seminary (Naples, Florida), Trinity Bible College and Seminary (Jacksonville, Florida), and Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary (Newburgh, Indiana), all degree mills, have no relationship with the legitimately accredited Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Illinois. In the more official FAQ for thi newsgroup, Rita Laws states, "In the US, the proprietor of a legal school may sue someone who calls it a diploma mill in a public forum. Newsgroup users should be careful about using this term and other derogatory statements because the writer is liable for whatever he or she posts. Even if the derogatory statement is true and eventually proven, under current US law, the accused might still have to pay for his or her own defense." Nonsense. I have been referring to certain schools as degree mills (and, in some cases, dipoma mills) for several years and, despite a few well-directed threats of litigation, *none* of them have ever sued me. Not that I wouldn't mind - I can always use the publicity. The fact is that is a school walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a degree mill, we can feel free to call them for what they are. 12. Okay, what about schools that are unaccredited but state approved? Depends on the state. Some fifteen states do not require licensure for schools that purport to be religious, which is why there are so many religious degree mills operating today. (LaSalle and Miami Christian Universities are good examples.) Some people believe that schools that are state approved in California are credible but, with few exceptions, I disagree. California has historically been a haven for degree mills and, even though they have tightened their laws for degree-granting institutions, they do not always enforce their laws effectively. Let me say this as clearly as possible: the *only* unquestioned, nationally recognized standard for a legitimate school is regional accreditation. Period. If you pursue a degree from *any* school that is not regionally accredited, chances are that it will have some limitations in terms of either your prospects for professional licensure, your chances for admission to the graduate school of your choice, or the credibility of your credentials in general (including possible ramifications related to your employment). 13. C'mon, are you serious? Do people actually pay attention to issues like accreditation? You bet your ass they do. If you're a new newsgroup reader and don't believe it, just retrieve some of the older posts in this newsgroup to get a handle on credibility issues regarding college and university degrees. You'll find that the people who have unaccredited degrees are more hung up than anyone else about defending the alleged credibility of their credentials. ,-~~-.___. / | ' \ ( ) 0 \_/-, ,----' Click the "continued in Part 2" link to move on ==== // Continued in Part 2 - - - > / \-'~; /~~~(O) / __/~| / | =( _____| (_________| ---------------------------- Steve Levicoff, Ph.D. 76624.376@compuserve.com <------ this link will give you Professor Levicoff's profile and even let you send him an e-mail ----------------------------